[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It would be really nice and handy to initiate either stateless or >> stateful DHCPv6 with the same message. If so, we wouldn't need >> the M/O bits anymore. In this case the client would simply initiate >> a(n Information) Request message and would get all the information >> that are available on the link, including an address or not. > > So you don't believe that the RA in ND should be the > authority to use a > stateful model on an IPv6 link?
stateful/stateless is of no concern to the client, right? so if the initiator is always the same, then the question of authority becomes moot. -- Mat -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
