Hello,

I've (re)read the whole big thread on the recent discussion about the
RA M/O flags starting at around end of May.  We even had a meta-level
discussion about whether those flags might better be removed
altogether (again!), but it looks we agreed that we need at least some
kind of indication in RA.

While opinions on the details so varied, we seem to have agreed that
we need to fix the requirements for those flags (or something
similar/replacement in RA) first.

Based on a nice initial attempt by Ralph...

http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05141.html

...I'd summarize the requirements raised in the thread as follows:

1) Ability to indicate to a host "DHCP is not available on this link",
   with the expectation that the host won't send any DHCP messages

   1') Some people (one person?) also wanted the ability to indicate
   to a host "a particular type of DHCPv6 (i.e., ICB or HCB) is not
   available on this link"  (This is probably a combination like
   M=0&&O=1 would currently indicate)

2) Ability for a host to get all desired and available DHCP
   configuration with a single DHCP message exchange
   - if a host wants HCB, it sends an HCB request (Solicit) and receives
     HCB and/or ICB replies
   - if a host wants ICB, it sends an ICB request (Information-request) 
     and receives ICB replies

3) Ability to do DHCP without having to configure routers
  (e.g., by ignoring RA with M=0 and/or O=0 and invoking HCB and/or
  ICB anyway)

Am I missing anything?  Note that I'm not saying we need all of them;
I'm currently trying to list all major points raised in the past
discussion.  Some of those may turn out to be a non-requirement.

Once we can fix the list, we'll then start the main discussion of
which is really necessary and how to do that.  (And I'd like to not
start that type of discussion at the moment so that we can move
forward step-by-step, avoiding further confusion or divergence).

                                        JINMEI, Tatuya
                                        Communication Platform Lab.
                                        Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to