On 27-jul-2005, at 9:44, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Requirement 1 simply says "DHCP is not available"; it doesn't say
"do
not try to find it".
I disagree. On some networks it's inappropriate to try to use DHCPv6.
You can disagree about anything, but please remember that we are (or
at least I'm) currently concentrating on listing points raised so far,
without discussing whether each point is valid or not. And, in fact,
there has actually been an opposite opinion to yours in the past
discussion.
Hence the discussion. There have also been others who agree with me.
The trouble is, that you weakened the requirement by saying "it
doesn't say "do not try to find it"."
Can we hold off expressing opinions on the possible requirements a bit
while, please? Otherwise, we'll soon see a strom of different
opinions as we've seen in the previous threads. (Such a storm is
perhaps inevitable in the next phase of this discussion though).
Perhaps it's possible to get together in person with a small group of
people with strong opinions about the subject to see if there is some
way to work all of this out? I really don't see how why this would be
unsolvable, but for some reason we can't seem to get past this.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
