On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:06:40AM -0400, Ralph Droms wrote: > Seems to me the WG ought to work through these questions: > > 1. Is RFC 3484 adequate to solve the address selection problem? > > My guess is "no", because of its references to site-local addresses and > other deficiencies discussed in this thread. If the answer is no, the > first step for the WG would be to update RFC 3484.
Rich seemed amenable to this when asked recently. In doing so, we should review default policy to minimise the requirement to change policy, e.g. fix the corner cases like ULAs+multicast being broken. -- Tim/::1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
