On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:06:38AM +0100,
Pars Mutaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 52 lines which said:
> I believe that dot-local DNS (also called multicast DNS)
Multicast DNS does not imply the Bad (tm) ".local"! Read
draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-47.txt (approved by the IESG on 31 Oct 2006 and
stucked in RFC editor queue since, for unknown reasons).
> It works exactly as multicast DNS, except that there is no multicast.
>
> 1. Let the responder's DNS name be "johnsmith.local". The responder
> configures a name-based link-local IPv6 address:
>
> link-local subnet prefix | 64bithash("johnsmith.local")
It really looks like PNRP :
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/itsolutions/network/p2p/pnrp.mspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNRP
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
