On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:28:21AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:41:26PM +0100,
> Pars Mutaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 31 lines which said:
>
> > > Again, *read* draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-47.txt, the use of unicast is
> > > clearly possible (section 2.4).
> >
> > But it is still multicast DNS?
>
> I really do not understand you. Try in French :-) Because, obviously,
> if it is unicast, it is not multicast :-)
unicast is a degenerative case of multicast.
> Also, it is not really DNS, it is LLMNR (same packet format, many
> similar concepts but a different protocol).
LLMNR is not DNS mostly 'cause the IESG mandated it.
one could easly see this as DNS on a different port#.
--bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
