> > > > ... if your L2 supports broadcast but at significant power cost then i
> > > > suggest we revive bmanning's old DNS DISCOVER proposal.
> > > 
> > > I have no problem with that.  
> > 
> > yo, bill!
> 
>       yes?

yes, you.

>       you mean the DISCOVER ID that is -still- in the RFCED queue?    

yes, that one.

>       (and has been in one form or another for the past eight years?)

yes, it has.

>       why, under $DIETIES green earth would you want to push a dead
>       technology?  The IESG is dead-set against this.

because the IESG has turned over N times during those 8 years, and the idea
is still solid and useful and interesting, and the current proposed RFC is
experimental, and most importantly, because the need for it will continue to
resurface until we push it over the top of the hill and roll it down to the
town.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to