> I understand Itojun's suggestion that we can have a RH7 that will
> allow useful source routing without the danger associated with RH0.
> This sounds like a very good idea. However, realistically, I suspect
> that even if the RH7 standard was fully specified tomorrow, we would
> be waiting more than two years to have it implemented in production
> versions of software that operators are likely to be using.
Do not worry, we apply "Code then spec" basis (as seen on KAME T-shirt
page - have you checked it out?). we contact vendors of KAME directly
with patch, after careful tests and analyzations. then someone can
write up a specification.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
