> > If you've access to someone's machine and can twiddle parameters
> > of their IP stack, then RH0 isn't a big deal.
> I did not understand your point here.
> Are you trying to justify that RH0 are harmless regarding other kind
> of attacks ?
I think Joe was suggesting that if RH0 was useful to attackers, and
we suggested a knob to allow it to be turned on/off, then malware
would just turn it back on again. I was just pointing out that there
already are things that malware can do which produce nastier attacks
than RH0 permits.
(I'm not quite sure if I understood your question correctly.)
David.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
