At Thu, 17 May 2007 09:28:10 -0400,
Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While it would be useful to update 3542, I don't think it is necessary.
> It is out-of-date given that it says the Type 0 routing header is the
> only one defined (it isn't). However, I don't see the benefit of
> revising that spec *just* for this.
I agree...
> Perhaps we should simply add a statement to the errata page for 3542
> pointing to the deprecation document.
...but I don't think the errata page is the right place to note this
update either, since this is actually not an error of RFC3542 per se.
(Or can we use the errata page as a placeholder for possible updates
in the future?)
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
