On 2007-06-27 16:31, Kevin Kargel wrote:
...
The problem I see with having small ULA-C allocations is that as people
move around geographically those allocations will lose aggrebility.
I don't understand your comment. No ULA prefix aggregates ever - they
will always be specific routes, and ULA-C is no different in that respect.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
