[vixie]
> > my concern about aggregation is that if someone receives 8 /48's that are
> > aligned as a /45 then they could conceivably advertise it as a /45.  i
> > hope that IANA will allocate nonaligned blocks, or perhaps give even
> > numbers to one RIR and odd numbers to the next, and that the RIRs and LIRs
> > will do likewise.

[carpenter]
> There is a statistical sense in which ULA-G would be more *potentially*
> aggregatable than ULA or ULA-C. If ULA-G prefixes are allocated on an
> RIR/LIR basis, the chance that two logically adjacent prefixes happen to be
> used by customers of the same local ISP will be finite, whereas it's
> vanishingly small for ULA or ULA-C.

so perhaps we need to retain the randomness idea with instructions that IANA
and every RIR and LIR use it to ensure nonaggregatability?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to