[vixie] > > my concern about aggregation is that if someone receives 8 /48's that are > > aligned as a /45 then they could conceivably advertise it as a /45. i > > hope that IANA will allocate nonaligned blocks, or perhaps give even > > numbers to one RIR and odd numbers to the next, and that the RIRs and LIRs > > will do likewise.
[carpenter] > There is a statistical sense in which ULA-G would be more *potentially* > aggregatable than ULA or ULA-C. If ULA-G prefixes are allocated on an > RIR/LIR basis, the chance that two logically adjacent prefixes happen to be > used by customers of the same local ISP will be finite, whereas it's > vanishingly small for ULA or ULA-C. so perhaps we need to retain the randomness idea with instructions that IANA and every RIR and LIR use it to ensure nonaggregatability? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
