Maybe I should have qualified 2) by asking how nominal is "nominal"? Just as reminder, I have already stated that my opinions do not necessarily reflect a corporate position:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg07620.html Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Vixie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:09 AM > To: Templin, Fred L > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-02.txt > > > From: "Templin, Fred L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > My use case questions that still need to be satisfied are: > > > > 1) can any site (large or small) get a ULA-C? > > 2) can the ULA-C's be obtained at a nominal cost? > > 3) can the ULA-C's be published in the global DNS > > forward and reverse? > > 4) can the ULA-C's be kept out of the DFZ? > > > > If Paul's proposal answers all of these as "yes", then > > I have no objections. > > yes to all four. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
