[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I still agree with Christian that there is no technical reason to build > policy into the standard. Also, IMHO, this is discussion is coming close to > diverging from the technical realm and entering into "Big Business".
while it's probably more correct, in terms of organizational layering, for IETF to specify only the top 8 bits of these addresses and say "let the ASO decide how to carve it up for the RIRs", i think we can do better, and safely too. we ought to be able to paint enough of a picture that even end users can see their place in the solution just from this RFC alone. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
