At Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:06:26 -0400,
"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having taken care of an NA target address that happens to be any address
> assigned to the receiving interface, now we are left with only a target
> address that is in ND cache of the receiving interface. Once a tentative
> address has been taken care of, the processing of NA goes into checking
> if target address lies in ND cache of the receiving interface and hence
> section 7.2.5 of 2461bis applies - this rule takes care of an
> unsolicited NA sent by a neighbor to the interface. Such unsolicited
> NA's are used by nodes to update new ND information to neighbors.
My point is that it's not so obvious (at least to me) by simply saying
"If the target address is not tentative, the advertisement is
processed as described in [I-D.ietf-ipv6-2461bis]". Hence my proposed
text. I'm not sure whether you agree with it or not, but I'm still
not convinced that referring to 2461bis is enough. So, I still plan
to keep my proposed change unless I hear otherwise from others.
Thanks,
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
