Sorry, if I missed the paragraph Tatuya wanted to add. As I said before, could I please see the new para for section 5.4.4 of 2461bis and I will review it right away and get back to you. I have not agreed to Tatuya's changes yet.
Thanks. Hemant -----Original Message----- From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 12:57 PM To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? Cc: Hemant Singh (shemant); [email protected] Subject: Re: Revisit: one remaining corner case in DAD Hi Jinmei, I agree with your proposed change. Just referring to RFC4861 is not clear enough. You can arrive at the same conclusion by pointing to RFC4861, but the reasoning is a bit more circular. Since there is no text with the EXACT semantic in RFC4861, I prefer your suggested text. Cheers Suresh JINMEI Tatuya / ???? wrote: > At Thu, 5 Jul 2007 11:06:26 -0400, > "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Having taken care of an NA target address that happens to be any >> address assigned to the receiving interface, now we are left with >> only a target address that is in ND cache of the receiving interface. >> Once a tentative address has been taken care of, the processing of NA >> goes into checking if target address lies in ND cache of the >> receiving interface and hence section 7.2.5 of 2461bis applies - this >> rule takes care of an unsolicited NA sent by a neighbor to the >> interface. Such unsolicited NA's are used by nodes to update new ND information to neighbors. > > My point is that it's not so obvious (at least to me) by simply saying > "If the target address is not tentative, the advertisement is > processed as described in [I-D.ietf-ipv6-2461bis]". Hence my proposed > text. I'm not sure whether you agree with it or not, but I'm still > not convinced that referring to 2461bis is enough. So, I still plan > to keep my proposed change unless I hear otherwise from others. > > Thanks, > > JINMEI, Tatuya > Communication Platform Lab. > Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
