At Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:00:10 -0400,
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though putting this into a list (1., 2., 3.) would likely make it
> much more readable and parseable.
> > On receipt of a valid Neighbor Advertisement message on an
> > interface, node behavior depends on whether the target address is
> > tentative or matches a unicast or anycast address assigned to the
> > interface:
> > 1. If the target address is tentative, the tentative
> > address is not unique.
> > 2. If the target address matches a
> > unicast address assigned to the receiving interface, the
> > advertisement SHOULD be discarded and the node SHOULD log a system
> > management error; this case would indicate that the address is a
> > duplicate but it has not been detected by the Duplicate Address
> > Detection procedure, which should be manually handled by the
> > system administrator.
> > 3. Otherwise, the advertisement is processed as described
> > in [I-D.ietf-ipv6-2461bis].
I tend to agree (I also thought this as an option myself). Thanks for
the suggestion.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
