> I think we should avoid any "straw man" arguments, as those tend not to > actually help advance the subject matter.
while i agree, i think this doesn't go far enough. can people who post here say whether they are in favour or opposed to the outstanding drafts and if they're opposed (or even if not) can they offer suggestions for improvement? ultimately the "advancement" of the subject matter will be measured by consensus-driven standards, and not merely by well worded arguments, with winners and losers, in the mailing list archive. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
