On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 09:58:31PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> And read twice my text, which was only with a clarification purpose about
> something wrong in the thread:
> "I'm not saying that this is related to ULA-C, I still believe it should be
> kept separated, and ULA-C is NOT to be used as a replacement of PA/PI, ...".
i was already drafting a mail pointing out that the only part of your
mail he didn't quote was the one that deflated his entire attack on you.
i don't always agree with your proposals and suggestions, but please
continue to stick up for yourself when this happens. i didn't have enough
time in the day to do so when it was done to me.
> So if you want to manipulate text, please, do with your own emails, not with
> clarifications from others.
seriously. his replies to my mails were so misquoted i barely recognized
them as my own, my examples were extended to such stupid extremes (see
also: strawman) that i couldn't believe a networking professional would
even consider drawing such conclusions from those examples, and in general
my mails were returned with such hostility that i wonder if Mr. Massar's
purpose here is trying to achieve consensus or simply trying to detract
anyone from participating who doesn't share his own opinion.
i must admit, going on the RIR mailing lists and screaming "this is an
IETF problem, leave it alone" and then going to IETF mailing lists
screaming "this is a RIR problem, leave it alone" makes for a very
compelling and potentially successful technique.
kudos, Mr. Massar. kudos.
-- bill (in favor of the direction the vixie-global draft provides or
working towards a central-03 draft incorporating ideas from
the vixie draft)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
