> The sole purpose of this group is in the maintenance of the core
>IPv6 protocol specifications and *not* in the development of new
>solutions or changes to the specifications. For example, the deployment
>of new transition tools is out of scope of this working group.
>Proposals for work beyond the scope of this working group should be sent
>to relevant ADs.
>
> Please review the proposed charter and provide comments.
i think it is a bit minor, but i thought i should bring it up.
from the proposed charter:
> o Complete work on Centrally Allocated Unique Local Addresses (ULA-C)
>Jul 2008 Submit ULA-C specification to IESG as a Proposed Standard
i'm not too sure if ULA-C has wg consenssu to be the way forward.
so i would object to this wording.
note: there was problem raised in SIDR as to how to handle X509 certs
for ULA (or ULA-C? i'm not sure about it)
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
