Let me just add something on this: > For example, the deployment > of new transition tools is out of scope of this working group. > Proposals for work beyond the scope of this working group should be sent > to relevant ADs. > This is a topic that I would like to see discussed in the the IETF, at least in the form of asking whether we have requirements for new work. The new maintenance group that we are creating is not the right place for that discussion, but I do want to have a forum. Stay tuned.
Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
