-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Feb 26, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Duncan, Richard J CTR DISA JITC wrote: > Is there also anyway the new node requirements RFC could be > somewhat reconciled with the new US Government IPv6 Profile and the > DoD IPv6 Profile? I find myself of two minds here. From one perspective, is there a desire that the two be identical? If so, is there any chance that the authors of those profiles could talk with the IETF about their lines of reasoning? My sense is that the profiles are just that - that whatever the IETF may have thought on a topic, that NIST and DoD have each chosen to think differently, and that a vendor looking at the issues needs to review each of the relevant sets of requirements. From the other perspective, whether or not the two are identical, there are obviously different lines of reasoning here, and the IETF (gasp) might be incorrect on one point or another. Which brings me back to - is there any chance that not only the differences could be summarized, but the reasoning behind the differences? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFHw5pvbjEdbHIsm0MRAvNhAJ0frCOhEJPDxMiiz6ULX6125oknrwCaAke5 GB9zD6i4UmWfIbHDVuAyO+Q= =3PyU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
