> -----Original Message----- > From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > If this draft wants to bypass that rule: > > The goal of the draft is not to make any recommendations to either > receiving end nodes or intermediate nodes. The goal of the > draft is to > propose a standard extension header format. That's it. Period. If you > found any text in the draft that suggests some action on the nodes, I > can remove it (Please point it out to me). It was not my intention to > specify any skip/drop behavior on the nodes. I understand what you are saying. But my point is that it was specifically this lack of explicit limits on who may safely "skip over" any EH that made my knee jerk. It's almost like the draft conflicts with RFC 2460, or at least seems to PERMIT such a conflict to occur. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
