On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:24:41PM -0400, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > Those clients are broken however. Getting a DHCPv6 address assigned and > assuming it is /64 (and on link) is wrong. If there is no prefix > advertisement, the client should only assume a /128.
Being "wrong" or "working but broken" in the eyes of the IETF is a matter that causes few people, including myself, consternation; their network is working during a router outage. They don't care if it was supposed to be broken by design. -- Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul. Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/ -- David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time, Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again." Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgpXgWUaVVzIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
