In your previous mail you wrote: > BEHAVE's issue is to decide whether dropping them is > an acceptable recommendation for v4->v6 translators. So there are really several cases => you do two can-be-wrong assumptions here: - NATs don't verify checksums: they use so called incremental updates which are far easier (constant and small time) - in the case of v6/v4 translations often only addresses are translated and in some cases in a stateless way. So there is no need to reassemble packets. As you work for Microsoft, can you explain current and future windows behavior about UDP checksums (I believe the default is non-zero offloaded into the hardware but I'd like to know more...)?
Thanks [email protected] BTW I asked LISP author to downgrade the MUST into something more reasonable (even it doesn't matter in v4/v6 translation). -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
