Hi,yes, because RFC2460 says "MUST use always" and the intent here is to loosen that restriction for LISP and AMT.
(And I'm sure Noel will again call this "red-tape legalese", but the fact is that this change revises the standing IETF consensus, and there's a process for that.)
Lars On 2009-8-13, at 18:24, Dino Farinacci wrote:
On 2009-8-11, at 19:55, Dino Farinacci wrote:If we changed the text in the LISP draft from "MUST" to "MAY", would we still need to write the accompanying document to RFC 2460? Maybe Lars can comment on this.In my opinion, any change from the MUST in RFC2460 requires updating RFC2460. LarsFrom my text I wrote above, if we changed from MUST to MAY *in the LISP draft*, do we have to update RFC2460? Dino
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
