The chairs of 6MAN would like to here feedback on these drafts as they apply to the problem spaces raised (AMT, v4/v6 translators, and LISP).
From my perspective, AMT and LISP both have the same requirements in terms of performance and having encapsulation work well over LAGs. It turns out that there is even a greater performance issue with AMT because as you replicate a multicast packet to each gateway tunnel, the outer IP addresses are different for each tunnel and therefore require a different pseudo-header to be built for each UDP replicated encapsulation.
So I am in support of Marshall's draft. Dino -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
