On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:17:27 +0900 Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I really don't see why LAN segments *need* /64s either then. > > as the subject, but not the $subject, has changed, could you please > remove me from the cc:s. thanks.
Apologies for that. Can we generalise the subject into non-64 bit IIDs, as it also covers the /127 case, and nearly all the reasons for non-/64s on LANs are the same as in the draft? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
