On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:22:09 -0400, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The one obvious conclusion here is that if we want hosts to actually set > flow labels, then we are largely preempting network modification of > those flow labels. Whatever setting we want to allow, it would have to > preserve the granularity of the original flow label variation. Which is > pretty hard. > Now, I personally don't quite understand what the "modified flow label" > proposal is for. As such, I don't mind giving it up. Particularly if I > get cleaner packet processing for the normal case as a result. +1 // Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
