-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
snip
> This is a less invasive change (and I think the WG had previously some
> concensus on this, but the WG chairs will know). But yes, the formally
> correct procedure is likely the errata approach.
This was bothering me a bit and I went back to past versions.
The Conclusion section (a terse version of section 4) was removed
in -05 becuase it was redundant, but that section stated
(5) do not shorten one 16 bit 0 field, but always shorten when
there are two or more consecutive 16 bit 0 fields
which I admit is the more explicit than section4.
Regards,
Seiichi
>
> /js
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAkxaOJgACgkQcrhTYfxyMkIaCgCfUVbwvhAP/Te2kWH2CIGrsNdh
nlIAniMCMXhQNyeXaTymb/kQhnkTeDfb
=depp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
