> We think this is OK for an AUTH48 change I agree, we can call this editorial.
Regards Brian Carpenter On 2010-08-06 09:32, Bob Hinden wrote: > After some discussion between the author, chairs, and Suresh who raised the > issue, we think the following text will resolve the issue and can be done in > AUTH48: > > 4.2.1. Shorten as Much as Possible > > The use of the symbol "::" MUST be used to its maximum capability. > For example, 2001:db8:0:0:0:0:2:1 must be shortened to > 2001:db8::2:1. Likewise, 2001:db8::0:1 is not acceptable, because the > symbol > "::" could have been used to produce a shorter representation > 2001:db8::1. > > We think this is OK for an AUTH48 change as it is adding an example to > clarify the issue and not changing the rule itself. > > Bob > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
