> Thus, do ask Cisco and Juniper and other vendors where this now 'works' > if this intentional, or if they might finally comply to the IPv6 > specifications one day, as then you might better watch out for this as > it will break your network. For the vendors that have it, it might maybe > be an idea to have a 'disable subnetanycast' command or similar so that > one can explicitly mark a prefix that way.
I have no plans to ask Cisco and Juniper about this. I want /127 to continue working, and couldn't care less about subnet anycast for my core routers. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
