On 2010-08-16 11:41, [email protected] wrote: >> Thus, do ask Cisco and Juniper and other vendors where this now 'works' >> if this intentional, or if they might finally comply to the IPv6 >> specifications one day, as then you might better watch out for this as >> it will break your network. For the vendors that have it, it might maybe >> be an idea to have a 'disable subnetanycast' command or similar so that >> one can explicitly mark a prefix that way. > > I have no plans to ask Cisco and Juniper about this. I want /127 to > continue working, and couldn't care less about subnet anycast for my > core routers.
I think you miss my point: they might finally comply with the specs one day (if you ask or not, others might) and you will have forgotten about this little subtle problem and upgrade your routers and voila your network is broken. If I where you, or anybody else who is using this 'feature' I would be wary of it and make a big big note for the test-lab to test this before shoving new versions to the live network. Greets, Jeroen -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
