Hi, I have a question or two to the draft authors who can hopefully clarify the expected context and working of this scheme, which at the moment is a bit unclear. In essence the problem this draft appears to be trying to solve is using RS/RA messages to induce state into intermediate or IP edge devices like what is done for DHCP, with the LIO being used to induce such state. All this is presumably meant to take place following an RS message sent by a client. Thus, my questions are: How does this solution cope in a case where the client does not send an RS? (or the RS sending has timed out)?
Thanks, Woj. On 10 August 2010 20:08, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > 6MAN WG, > This is a consensus call on adopting: > > Title : Line identification in IPv6 Router Solicitation > messages > Author(s) : S. Krishnan, et al. > Filename : draft-krishnan-6man-rs-mark-06.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2010-08-04 > > as a 6MAN working group document. Please state your opinion, positive > or negative, on the mailing or to the chairs. This consensus call will > end on August 27, 2010. > > Regards, > Brian & Bob > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
