Suresh, >> that wasn't quite the question I asked. DHCPv6 has a well defined mechanism >> to periodically retry, while RS client sending simply timeout. This would >> seemingly leave such clients in the proposed scheme with no connectivity. > > I do see your problem, but that problem is common to all existing SLAAC > clients and is not specific to LIO. If your problem is "RFC4861/62 compliant > clients give up after retransmitting an RS 3 times", I am not sure what this > draft can do about it.
I think the main difference is that for all other SLAAC hosts, they will receive a multicast RA which will trigger SLAAC. is that also going to happen in this case? cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
