Le 18 sept. 2010 à 02:22, JP Vasseur a écrit : > On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > ... >> >> However, it would be pretty easy to put something in 6lowpan to carry those >> 3 bytes. >> (Consider it an advanced form of header compression for the 48-byte IP-in-IP >> thing, if you don't like the sub-IP thinking.) >> Consult http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-ext-hdr-00 for a >> sample base design. >> Such a simple extension may actually be a preferable way to carry ROLL in >> 6lowpan. > > "preferable" in which sense ?
At least, IMHO, in that it eliminates the motivation to interfere with the current discussion on improving flow-label utilization. Regards, RD -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
