> However, I believe that as far as routing is concerned, IPv6 continues > to be based on CIDR. There is nothing special about the 64 boundary > from a routing perspective.
and, to be pedantic but very purposfully specific, a forwarding perspective > I'd like to hear from operators as to whether they want the > functionality of being able to assign subnets of arbitrary length, or > whether it would be sufficient to only support /127s. arbitrary, please randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
