Mark, -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Smith Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:12 AM To: Thomas Narten Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
>I think the Addressing Architecture RFC would need to be changed, as it >stipulates 64 bit interface ids, which I think implies a maximum of 64 >bit prefix lengths, unless these /127s were only permitted within 0::/3 >- the impacted text is in 2.5.1 of RFC4291 - >"For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary > value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long and to be > constructed in Modified EUI-64 format." Why should any text in RFC 4291 change? The IID for /127 starts with binary 000 and only the Modified EUI-64 format has got to deal with the u/g bits. Hemant -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
