The below white paper from Cisco asserts that most vendors including Cisco process Hop-by-Hop extension headers in CPU (slow path). Is this correct?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk872/technologies_white_paper0900aecd8054d37d.html If Yes, then we should not add support for more sub options with HBH header. Kam -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
