Manav, On 04/02/2011 01:05 a.m., Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > If there are folks who ignore the hop by hop options field then it > makes the entire discussion about not supporting > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-01 moot. Given > this, it makes all the more sense to either proceed with this draft > as it is or change it to define a standard format for all IPv6 > extension headers that get defined in future (which is precisely what > it did in its first version).
Huh? I don't follow. Could you please explain how the current discussion on Hop-by-Hop extensions relate to the aforementioned I-D? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: [email protected] || [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
