Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-02-22 19:24, Pekka Savola wrote: >> >> Which part of 3697 that is relevant to this document is plain >> confusing? Those that pertain to this spec are IMHO in Section 3 which >> seems clear enough to me (copied below). > > But this text will be completely different in 3697bis. I really > wouldn't want to set people off coding according to something that > we already know will change.
All the more reason this document should mention both 3697 _and_ that we expect it to change. -- John Leslie <[email protected]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
