On 2011-02-23 10:23, John Leslie wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2011-02-22 19:24, Pekka Savola wrote:
>>> Which part of 3697 that is relevant to this document is plain
>>> confusing? Those that pertain to this spec are IMHO in Section 3 which
>>> seems clear enough to me (copied below).
>> But this text will be completely different in 3697bis. I really
>> wouldn't want to set people off coding according to something that
>> we already know will change.
>
> All the more reason this document should mention both 3697 _and_ that
> we expect it to change.
That would do no harm.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
