On 13 May 2011, at 14:45, Ralph Droms wrote: >> >> New: >> >> <t> DHCPv6 <xref target='RFC3315' /> can be used to obtain and >> configure addresses. In general, a network may provide for the >> configuration of addresses through Router Advertisements, >> DHCPv6 or both. Some operators have indicated that they do >> not intend to support stateless address autoconfiguration on >> their networks and will require all address assignments be >> made through DHCPv6. On such networks, devices that support >> only stateless address autoconfiguration will be unable to >> automatically configure addresses. Consequently all hosts >> SHOULD implement address configuration via DHCP.</t> >> >> >> Is this acceptable? > > Looks fine and appropriate to me, with one nit: s/DHCP/DHCPv6/ in the last > line.
Looks good. Personally I would probably say 'support' rather than 'implement' in the last sentence, as per the first sentence of 5.9.2 where we say "Hosts MUST support IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration", but either is OK. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
