> Please respond yes or no. Given the WG's previous hesitation to having > DHCPv6 be a SHOULD, it is important that we get a clear indication of > whether or not the WG supports this change.
Should be a SHOULD. Fred > Thomas > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
