On 04 Jan 2012, at 17:40 , Fernando Gont wrote: >> Earlier, Mark Andrews wrote: >>> Atomic fragments > 1280 should not appear in the network. >>> Atomic fragments <= 1280 are a expected part of the IPv6 landscape. >>> For TCP they should be rare. > > How about stateless translators translating TCP traffic, and sending an > ICMPv6 PTB traffic for the same reasons as discussed for the UDP case?
Good point. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
