On 01/04/2012 10:57 AM, RJ Atkinson wrote: > Earlier, Mark Andrews wrote: >> Atomic fragments > 1280 should not appear in the network. >> Atomic fragments <= 1280 are a expected part of the IPv6 landscape. >> For TCP they should be rare.
How about stateless translators translating TCP traffic, and sending an ICMPv6 PTB traffic for the same reasons as discussed for the UDP case? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
