On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:10:40AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > > I see no value in introducing a new separator.
> >
> > The value is providing a long-term path to cut and paste. Otherwise,
> > I assume we would indeed choose the %25 approach.
>
> OK, I change my statement to:
>
> I do not believe that the value of introducing a new separator
> justifies its costs.
>
> Is there any value in trying to add "%%" to the URI BNF? This would
seem to give us *almost* cut and paste (which we don't quite have now
anyway, since we must add '[' and ']') while disambiguating whether
"%251" means "%1" or "%251" to the browser UI ("%%1" -> "%251").
Lots of systems use ESC ESC to really mean ESC.
-K-
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
