On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 02:31:24PM -0700, Stuart Cheshire wrote: > At the meeting in Vancouver, Dave Thaler made a point that I found > convincing: > > Where is the character set for IPv6 zone IDs specified? If we accept > that future interface names might include non-roman characters, then > we have to assume that to allow safe unambiguous use in URIs, > interface names have to undergo escaping. > > And if the interface name itself is going to be escaped using URI "%xx" > notation, then why not escape the '%' the same way? > > This argues in support of what Microsoft already did: Encode '%' as > "%25". > > It's not my favourite outcome, but based on Dave Thaler's comment, > it's the one that gets my vote.
+1 /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
