Hi Usman,
At 17:08 26-09-2012, Usman Latif wrote:
There is clearly two set of recommendations over the same addressing
scenario which I am only trying to clarify with the IETF community.
RFC 6164 has recommendations that do not encompass all the
recommendations that were put forward in RFC 5375
So although when RFC 6547 moved the RFC 3627 to historical status,
it completely ignored that RFC 5375 has additional recommendations
for the same /127 and /128 addressing scenarios.
What I am now trying to clarify is - should we consider
recommendations in RFC 5375 (section B.2) as obsolete ?
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg13685.html
Regards,
-sm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
