--- On Thu, 27/9/12, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Randy Bush <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IPv6 address assignment for strictly point-to-point links and
Device Loopbacks
To: "Usman Latif" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Received: Thursday, 27 September, 2012, 9:17 AM
> There is clearly two set of recommendations over the same addressing
> scenario which I am only trying to clarify with the IETF community.
no. but please go do whatever you want in your network and stop trying
to stir a long cold pot
randy
I would only if I owned the whole internet :)
If you have links to any previous discussions / blogs on this long cold pot,
pls point me to them so I can convince myself that both 5375 and 6164 have same
recommendations for /127 (and /128)
Usman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
